I walked in on Mark while he was listening to this CD and was nearly sucked in despite being uninterested in the contents. Neil Kramer has a very soothing "radio"-quality voice.

Science is a religion because it’s based on a belief system

Science is rather almost an antithesis to a belief system. Because it not only requires you to find a hypothesis (an idea or belief) but also proof of the correctness of that idea.

Science also evolves. It is not cast in stone. If a new hypothesis fits the facts better than the previous dominant theory, it becomes the new dominant theory. (note the difference between hypothesis and theory. In science a theory is a hypothesis supported by evidence)

A case in point is the theory of gravity. Einstein's theory is more accurate than Newton's. But in our daily lives on Earth the differences are so vanishingly small that the much simples Newtonian theory is still taught and used to great effect.

From lawfulrebellion.org:

‘where does electricity come from?’ Good question, I have no idea past the notion that it’s produced in giant complexes and pushed down wire to us. Without swallowing a whole load of scientific jargon for years on end, I would have no clue of their belief on this question.

Bullshit. I learned about electricity in what we call secondary school (highschool is the US term, I think?). It does not require "years on end" to understand.

Displaying one's ignorance is a very poor argument to disprove anything.

They talk about how a Photon (basis of the physical world we see) can only be observed and cannot be predicted, and that light is both a wave and particle – what was there is no more and what could be can happen, all in less than a millisecond.

Photons are just one kind of particle in the standard model. There are many others. The author is also mashing up wave-particle duality and a twisted version of the uncertainty principle. They are related only in that they are both part of quantum mechanics.